Sybil surge of identical-pattern transactions
Aave v3's assessment for RD-F-097 — scored not_assessed on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No sybil surge of identical-pattern transactions applicable. The April 18 attack involved a single sophisticated actor (Lazarus / DPRK TraderTraitor), not a sybil wave. v1-deferred.
Sources #
- Curator noteM3a specialist assessmentT-10 assessment and M3a specialist evaluation; see .research/protocols/aave-v3/ for narrative reportretrieved 2026-04-27
Methodology #
Detect multiple new EOAs submitting identical transaction patterns within a short window (sybil setup pattern).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol aave-v3 factor RD-F-097 score not_assessed collected_at 2026-04-27 23:28:46