Oracle price deviation >X% from secondary

Across Protocol's assessment for RD-F-099 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Oracle price deviation >X% from secondary | Partial — bridge-specific re-mapping required | UMA OO is a dispute mechanism, not a price oracle. F099 as specified does not apply. Re-mapped signal: UMA `DisputedRootBundle` event on HubPool (`0xc186fA914353c44b2E33eBE05f21846F1048bEda`). No disputed root bundles detected in assessment window. UMA OO operational. | Primary oracle deviates >X% from secondary (re-mapped: UMA disputed bundle) | No (signal re-mapping needed)

Sources #

Curator note
Extracted from 06-realtime-intel.md — RD-F-099; no URL citedretrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Detect whether the primary oracle's reported price deviates >X% from the best available secondary source (another feed or venue).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol across-protocol factor RD-F-099 score gray collected_at 2026-04-30 21:19:18