Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Across Protocol's assessment for RD-F-172 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
GitHub commit history inspection (master branch, recent 10-15 commits) shows no commits with `Co-authored-by: GitHub Copilot` or `Co-authored-by: ChatGPT` in security-critical files. One `github-actions[bot]` co-authorship found in "chore: Organize contracts folder" commit (March 24, 2026) — this is an automated folder reorganization, not code generation in security-critical paths. No AI-tool co-authorship metadata in SpokePool.sol, HubPool.sol, or chain adapter commits visible in recent hist...
Sources #
- GitHubhttps://github.com/across-protocol/contracts/commits/master/contractsretrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →