Code divergence from upstream (%)
Aerodrome Finance's assessment for RD-F-129 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Cannot run git diff via WebFetch. (A) Aerodrome Pools vs Velodrome v2: profile §5 describes 'moderate-to-substantial' divergence (AERO tokenomics, two-governor structure, emission schedule all modified). Estimated 20–50% divergence. (B) Slipstream vs Uniswap v3: core tick math unchanged; gauges/bribe additions are new (~20–40% periphery divergence). Composite yellow (at least one codebase in 20–50% range).
Sources #
- DocsAerodrome SPECIFICATION.md (divergence evidence)Profile §5 fork divergence — moderate-to-substantial for Aerodrome Poolsretrieved 2026-05-04
- Aerodrome Slipstream (fork divergence)Slipstream repo — gauges/bribe additions on top of Uniswap v3 coreretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Measure the percentage of lines changed between this fork's deployed code and the stated upstream codebase at fork point.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →