defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Role separation: upgrade ≠ fee ≠ oracle

Babylon Protocol's assessment for RD-F-035 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

All role types (upgrade, fee parameters, oracle config) are governed by the same BABY governance module — no separate role holders. Oracle is not applicable (no price oracle in core protocol). Upgrade role = governance. Fee parameters changed via governance (Proposal #8 reduced unbonding fees). Role separation is structurally absent in a pure on-chain governance model without granular role contracts. Not a data gap — structural architecture of Cosmos SDK x/gov.

Sources #

Methodology #

Determine whether the upgrade role, fee-collection role, and oracle-config role are assigned to distinct addresses.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol babylon-protocol factor RD-F-035 score gray collected_at 2026-05-04 19:43:27