Role separation: upgrade ≠ fee ≠ oracle
Babylon Protocol's assessment for RD-F-035 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
All role types (upgrade, fee parameters, oracle config) are governed by the same BABY governance module — no separate role holders. Oracle is not applicable (no price oracle in core protocol). Upgrade role = governance. Fee parameters changed via governance (Proposal #8 reduced unbonding fees). Role separation is structurally absent in a pure on-chain governance model without granular role contracts. Not a data gap — structural architecture of Cosmos SDK x/gov.
Sources #
- DocsGovernance | Babylon DocsAll parameter changes via governance module; no separate role addressesretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Determine whether the upgrade role, fee-collection role, and oracle-config role are assigned to distinct addresses.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →