Protocol-impersonator domain registered (typosquat)
Babylon Protocol's assessment for RD-F-161 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No specific typosquat confirmed in the 90-day window (2026-02-03 to 2026-05-04) via public searches. However: (1) Babylon is the largest BTC DeFi protocol ($4.16B TVL), creating elevated brand-impersonation incentive; (2) confirmed adversarial brand targeting exists — January 2025 X account compromise demonstrated active threat actors targeting Babylon brand; (3) production domain monitoring (CertStream/PhishFort) not accessible — this is a known gap. Candidate typosquat domains (babylon-protocol.io, babylonlabs.com, babylon-staking.io, babylonprotocol.com) not confirmed as malicious. Yellow: elevated risk despite no confirmed active typosquat, due to high-value brand + known adversarial targeting + monitoring gap.
Sources #
- URLBeInCrypto — Babylon TVL ContextApril 2025 unstaking — $4.16B TVL confirms high-value brand requiring monitoringretrieved 2026-05-04
- QuadrigaInitiative — Babylon Labs Brand Attack EvidenceJanuary 2025 X account compromise — confirmed adversarial brand targetingretrieved 2026-05-04
Methodology #
Determine whether a typosquat of the official protocol domain has been registered in the last 90 days.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →