Bridge signer-set change proposed/executed
Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-103 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Bridge signer-set change [T-09 v1] | Applicable: Partial — no bridge operated; DAO Multisig signer changes are the functionally equivalent signal | BIP-907 (Jan 2026) replaced 4 of 11 DAO Multisig signers: removed 0xSausageDoge, AlexLangeVC, lewis, nanexcool; added elbagococina (0x6578183A...), netto.eth (0x235F00a6...), MikeB (0xF01Cc715...), hubert (0x02e4De71...). This governance-sanctioned change would have fired the signal at execution time; suppression applies (pre-announced via Snapshot). No further unscheduled signer changes detected since BIP-907. Current 6-of-11 threshold maintained. BIP-911 (Feb 2026) was emergency subDAO (not main DAO multisig) signer swap. | Threshold: SignerAdded / SignerRemoved / ThresholdChanged AND no governance pre-announcement in preceding 24h | Would fire: No (current signer set stable; BIP-907 was governance-sanctioned)
Sources #
- Docshttps://docs.balancer.fi/concepts/governance/multisig.htmlretrieved 2026-05-05
- https://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-907-update-dao-multisig-signer-set-and-adjust-annual-stipend/6956retrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Detect whether a bridge validator or signer-set change has been proposed or executed.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →