Unusual pending/executed proposal ratio
Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-110 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Unusual pending/executed proposal ratio | Applicable: Partial — Snapshot governance only; no on-chain Governor | Signal requires on-chain ProposalCreated / ProposalExecuted event ratio from a Governor contract. Balancer uses Snapshot + Gnosis Safe; no on-chain governor. Snapshot activity in 2026: BIP-907 (Jan), BIP-911 (Feb), wind-down proposals (March). Proposal activity is coordinated and purposeful during transition, not anomalous. No unusual ratio vs baseline detected. Adaptation required: monitor Snapshot proposal creation vs Gnosis Safe execution cadence. | Threshold: Pending/executed proposal ratio anomaly >3σ vs 30d baseline from on-chain Governor | Would fire: No (signal infrastructure N/A; Snapshot adaptation required)
Sources #
- Governancehttps://forum.balancer.fi/t/bip-907-update-dao-multisig-signer-set-and-adjust-annual-stipend/6956retrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Detect an unusual ratio of pending-to-executed governance proposals versus the trailing-30-day baseline.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →