defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Dependency manifest uses unpinned versions

Balancer (v2 + v3)'s assessment for RD-F-133 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

This factor applies to library dependencies even for original protocols. v3 package.json uses '@openzeppelin/contracts': '~5.4.0' (tilde = patch-only updates, relatively strict) and '@openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable': '^4.9.6' (caret = minor+patch updates, less strict). The caret on upgradeable contracts is less strict than ideal for security-critical dependencies. v2 vendored OZ locally in v2-solidity-utils — eliminates npm dependency risk for v2 OZ. Mixed strategy is yellow: v3 caret on upgradeable OZ is the risk item.

Sources #

Methodology #

Determine whether `package.json`, `Cargo.toml`, or `foundry.toml` uses `^` or `~` version ranges for security-critical libraries (OpenZeppelin, Solady, etc.).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol balancer factor RD-F-133 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-05 12:41:36