Storage-layout collision risk across upgrades

Cap (cUSD / stcUSD)'s assessment for RD-F-142 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Multiple cUSD implementations (7 total), 4 Lender versions, 2 stcUSD versions. OZ upgrades-plugin storage layout check not available via WebFetch. Curator-run infrastructure check required.

Sources #

Curator note
Storage layout analysis — requires curator tooling7 cUSD upgrades, 4 Lender upgrades, 2 stcUSD upgrades identified. Storage layout collision analysis requires OZ upgrades plugin run by curator. Not assessable via WebFetch.retrieved 2026-05-17

Methodology #

Determine whether the OZ upgrades-plugin or manual review flags a storage-layout collision risk between implementation versions.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol cap factor RD-F-142 score gray collected_at 2026-05-17 10:56:24