Hot-wallet signer flag

Chainlink CCIP's assessment for RD-F-030 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Cannot assess — signer addresses not public. Hot-wallet heuristic analysis requires known signer addresses. No on-chain data available to flag hot-wallet behavior.

Sources #

Docs
Onchain Architecture - Upgradability (EVM) | Chainlink DocumentationCCIP docs — signer addresses not disclosed; confirmed known gap per profile §6retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether ≥1 multisig signer address exhibits on-chain behavior consistent with a hot wallet (web-wallet signing pattern, no hardware signing indicators).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol chainlink-ccip factor RD-F-030 score gray collected_at 2026-05-16 01:55:09