Liquidity depth per major asset
Chainlink CCIP's assessment for RD-F-065 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not applicable — CCIP is a cross-chain messaging and token-bridge protocol with no on-chain AMM or liquidity pool. Tokens transit through token pools (lock/burn on source chain, mint/unlock on destination chain) rather than pooling in a DEX AMM. There is no single-pool depth to measure at 2% or 5% slippage thresholds. The closest analog is the per-lane rate-limit capacity, which bounds maximum transfer volume per window, not slippage. Taxonomy Cat 4 assigns F065 to 'all protocol types' but this was specified for DEX/perps with on-chain pools; the bridge transit model is structurally different and has no measurable liquidity depth.
Sources #
- Internal03-taxonomy.md Cat 4 PD-024 noteTaxonomy 03-taxonomy.md §Category 4 PD-024 resolution — F065 applicable to DEX/perps with on-chain poolsretrieved 2026-05-16
- CCIP Architecture | Chainlink DocumentationCCIP architecture overview confirming lock/burn/mint/unlock token pool model (no AMM, no liquidity pool)retrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Measure on-chain liquidity depth for protocol-held assets at 2% and 5% price impact in USD.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →