Known-exploit-template selector deployed by any address
Chainlink CCIP's assessment for RD-F-162 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No known exploit template exists for CCIP — 34 months of operation with zero protocol exploits means no in-sample exploit selector template has been created for CCIP's specific OCR/RMN message format. Generic bridge exploit templates (Wormhole ecrecover-zero-address, Nomad bytes32(0)-root, Ronin validator-compromise) do not map to CCIP's distinct architecture. No new contract deployments matching CCIP-class attack patterns detected via public OSINT.
Sources #
- InternalChainlink CCIP profile — incidents section.research/protocols/chainlink-ccip/00-profile.md §10 — zero protocol exploits in 34 months; no exploit template existsretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether any contract has been deployed containing a function-selector pattern matching a known exploit template targeting protocols of this class.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →