Large governance proposal queued
Concrete's assessment for RD-F-101 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Governance proposal signal: not applicable. Concrete has no on-chain Governor contract. Governance is EOA-admin-only (deployer EOA 0x1fa1c72a executes upgrades directly). No ProposalCreated or ProposalQueued events are emitted by any Concrete contract. Data cache confirms: governance.governor_address=null, governance.type='unknown', snapshot_space=null, governance.timelock_address=null. Admin transactions are detectable via RD-F-102 (admin tx in mempool) but not via governor event monitoring.
Sources #
- InternalConcrete data cache governance fields — all nulldata cache §sources.governance: governor_address=null, timelock_address=null, type='unknown', snapshot_space=nullretrieved 2026-05-17
- ConcreteFactory proxy Etherscan — direct admin execution, no GovernorConcreteFactory proxy 0x0265d73a8E61F698d8EB0dfeb91Ddce55516844C — no Governor contract; factory owner executes upgrades directlyretrieved 2026-05-17
Methodology #
Detect whether a governance proposal with potentially protocol-impactful payload has been queued for execution (including Security-Council threshold-reduction variant).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →