defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Bridge signer-set change proposed/executed

Concrete's assessment for RD-F-103 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Bridge signer-set change signal: not applicable. Concrete does not operate a bridge with a signer set. Pre-deposit vaults bridge to Berachain/Stable Network via an external (unidentified) mechanism, but that is not a Concrete-controlled bridge. Data cache confirms layerzero.present=false. No Concrete-operated bridge contracts found. The signal requires a protocol-controlled bridge validator/signer set — this architecture does not exist for Concrete.

Sources #

  • Internal
    Concrete protocol profile §7 bridge surface determination00-profile.md §7 — 'Is a bridge: No'; bridge surface for Berachain pre-deposit is via external unidentified bridge, not Concrete-operatedretrieved 2026-05-17
  • Internal
    Concrete data cache — no LayerZero bridge, no bridge signer setdata cache §sources.layerzero.present=false; coverage_flags.layerzero_bridge=falseretrieved 2026-05-17

Methodology #

Detect whether a bridge validator or signer-set change has been proposed or executed.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol concrete factor RD-F-103 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-17 14:36:59