Dependency graph (protocols depended upon)
crvUSD (Curve Stablecoin)'s assessment for RD-F-050 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Existential dependency on Curve's own stableswap pools (for both PegKeeper peg defense and AggregatorStablePrice pricing). TriCrypto pool for all collateral EMAs. Chainlink ETH/USD and BTC/USD for safety limits. wstETH (Lido), sfrxETH (Frax) staking contracts for redemption rates. Single-ecosystem coupling is the dominant structural dependency — Curve ecosystem failure cascades to oracle and peg defense simultaneously.
Sources #
- URLCurve Stablecoin Deep Dive — StateMindStateMind deep dive confirming non-redundant Curve pool dependency for collateral pricingretrieved 2026-05-16
- crvUSD protocol profile §7Profile §7 external contracts called: Curve stableswap pools, wstETH, sfrxETH, tBTC, WBTC collateral contractsretrieved 2026-05-16
- crvUSD Incident Report 2024-06-12 — LlamaRiskLlamaRisk June 2024 crvUSD depeg incident report — demonstrates oracle-rate-PegKeeper interdependency under stressretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
List all external protocols whose failure would directly impair this protocol (LST providers, bridges, stablecoin issuers, keepers).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →