Market-listing governance threshold
crvUSD (Curve Stablecoin)'s assessment for RD-F-072 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
crvUSD CDP new collateral markets require Curve DAO Ownership vote (Aragon): 7-day voting, 51% support, 30% min quorum of veCRV. This is HIGH-threshold governance. Historical examples: wstETH, WBTC, WETH, sfrxETH, tBTC all required separate DAO votes (The Block reporting on WETH governance vote). Community discussion on gov.curve.fi precedes on-chain vote. Governance process is comparable to Aave V3 AIP process in rigor. GHO PegKeeper onboarding also required DAO review (governance forum post Feb 2026). No permissionless market addition pathway exists in the crvUSD CDP system.
Sources #
- Docs
- crvUSD GHO PegKeeper Review — Curve Governance Forumgov.curve.fi — GHO PegKeeper onboarding governance review (Feb 2026)retrieved 2026-05-16
- Curve opens vote to add WETH collateral for crvUSD stablecoinThe Block — WETH governance vote for crvUSD with $200M debt ceilingretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Classify the governance threshold required to list a new market as: permissionless / low-threshold (team multisig) / high-threshold (DAO vote) / no new listings.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →