Real-capital social-engineering persona
Dolomite's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No evidence of any 'team contributor' or 'external integrator' persona building credibility via >=1M USD real-capital deposits to Dolomite or peer protocols for social-engineering purposes. The only notable large-position story related to Dolomite is World Liberty Financial (WLFI) borrowing on Dolomite as a lending protocol user - this is a legitimate protocol-usage case, not social engineering. The Drift Protocol UNC4736 pattern (6-month conference build-up + real-capital deposits + Solana durable-nonce pre-signing) has no analogous documented case for Dolomite. Team founders are long-tenured (8+ years) with continuous public identities - not recently-inserted personas. Assessed gray: M-only factor requiring curator confidence beyond on-chain trail; no positive indicator found; Drift comparator (explicit in F184 definition) does not apply.
Sources #
- Curator noteF184 curator assessment - gray (no positive indicator)F184 is M-only P1 factor per taxonomy batch-24; Drift Protocol UNC4736 comparator does not apply to Dolomite (8-year tenured founders, no new persona insertion found); OSINT passes all negative for social-engineering patternretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →