Hot-wallet signer flag

Falcon Finance's assessment for RD-F-030 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Cannot assess hot-wallet signing patterns for 5 pseudonymous signers without identity data. Deployer EOA (0x804016…) has on-chain activity consistent with an active wallet but is not the primary admin risk.

Detail #

5 signer addresses have no publicly known identities or signing behavior profiles. Hot-wallet assessment requires on-chain behavior analysis (nonce frequency, web3 provider patterns) which is inconclusive without identity confirmation. Deployer EOA is active (last tx ~21 days before assessment) — funded from MEXC exchange (not mixer).

Sources #

Etherscan
Deployer EOA on Etherscanhttps://etherscan.io/address/0x804016c31e52805eb00e0Ef42126Fd3e980A0b33retrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Determine whether ≥1 multisig signer address exhibits on-chain behavior consistent with a hot wallet (web-wallet signing pattern, no hardware signing indicators).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol falcon-finance factor RD-F-030 score gray collected_at 2026-05-12 04:06:37