defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Prior known-ignored disclosure

Falcon Finance's assessment for RD-F-177 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No prior incidents or post-mortems. Factor is N/A per methodology. Cannot assess ignored-disclosure pattern with 0 incidents.

Detail #

Methodology: gray = no prior incidents to evidence an ignored disclosure. 0 incidents confirmed via RD-F-077. No post-mortem exists. No rekt.news, OSINT, or security-researcher post citing a Falcon Finance ignored disclosure. Green by absence of evidence is not the same as gray — gray is the correct schema output here per 'no prior incidents (N/A)' guidance.

Sources #

  • Curator note
    Prior known-ignored disclosure — gray (no prior incidents)No prior incidents (RD-F-077 = 0). Factor N/A per methodology — cannot assess ignored-disclosure history.retrieved 2026-05-12

Methodology #

Determine whether evidence exists in prior-incident post-mortems that a disclosed vulnerability was reported to the team and not actioned before exploit.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol falcon-finance factor RD-F-177 score gray collected_at 2026-05-12 04:06:37