Real-capital social-engineering persona
Fluid's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No curator-flagged social-engineering persona with ≥$1M capital deposits to Fluid or peer protocols has been identified. F184 is M-only (requires curator flag at confidence threshold). The Drift DPRK incident (UNC4736/Lazarus, April 2026, $285M) targeted Drift Protocol specifically — no Instadapp/Fluid connection. No insider incident history in Fluid's 2-year live history. Assessed green/low-confidence (M-only factor, no adverse curator signal).
Sources #
- GovernanceSecurity budget post: 20+ audits total, Certora formal verification ongoinggov.fluid.io/t/security-budget-request/1754retrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →