External keeper/relayer not redundant
Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-062 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No external keeper/relayer (Gelato, Chainlink Automation) identified. Validators serve as oracle publishers and bridge signers (dual role). With 20-21 validators, there is no single-keeper dependency. Validator liveness is the functional analog to a keeper — a 2/3 quorum requirement means liveness is maintained as long as >2/3 validators are online.
Sources #
- Docs
Methodology #
Determine whether the protocol depends on a single keeper or relayer (Gelato, Chainlink Automation, custom) with no redundancy or failover.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-062 score green collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49