Post-exploit response score
Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-081 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
JELLY incident curator score 3.75/5: Compensation partial (Foundation covered HLP loss, attacker extracted ~$2.76M not recovered — 3/5); Transparency adequate (public wiki post-mortem with named root cause, but no commit diffs or code-level detail — 3/5); Root-cause depth good (attack vector understood, structural fix via margin tiers launched May 2025 — 4/5); Operational recovery strong (delist+settlement within ~2 hours — 5/5). Composite 3.75/5 = yellow (green threshold ~4.0 with full compensation and code-diff-linked post-mortem).
Sources #
- URL
- https://hyperliquid-co.gitbook.io/wiki/introduction/roadmap/incident/2025-26-03retrieved 2026-04-28
- https://www.halborn.com/blog/post/explained-the-hyperliquid-hack-march-2025retrieved 2026-04-28
Methodology #
Curator-score (1–5) the most recent incident response on: compensation completeness, transparency of disclosure, root-cause analysis depth, and operational recovery speed.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →