Large governance proposal queued

Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-101 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Hyperliquid has no on-chain Governor contract and no Snapshot space. HIPs are voted via stake-weighted validator declarations, not EVM on-chain events that can be monitored for flagged-pattern proposals. The Hyper Foundation multisig controls Bridge2 proxy admin with no timelock and no queued proposals. No flagged governance proposals identified. Applicable only to Bridge2 admin multisig (for direct admin-key change proposals), but no such proposals are queued. Last documented HIP proposals: HIP-1, HIP-2, HIP-3 (historical). HYPE burn proposal (December 2025) did not involve admin-key changes.

Sources #

Docs
https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/hyperliquid-improvement-proposals-hipsretrieved 2026-04-28
Curator note
Source for RD-F-101retrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Detect whether a governance proposal with potentially protocol-impactful payload has been queued for execution (including Security-Council threshold-reduction variant).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-101 score gray collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49