Admin/upgrade transaction in mempool

Hyperliquid's assessment for RD-F-102 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Bridge2 proxy admin address is not publicly disclosed (safe_api_gap: true in data cache). This prevents enumeration of the admin key set required for live signal detection. L1 software upgrades are distributed as closed-source binary releases outside the EVM mempool. No admin upgrade txs detected in available public data. Gray: undisclosed admin address makes live monitoring impossible for Bridge2. If the admin address were known (retrievable via eth_getStorageAt on Bridge2 at slot 0xb53127684a568b3173ae13b9f8a6016e243e63b6e8ee1178d6a717850b5d6103 on Arbitrum), the signal would be applicable to Bridge2. Curator gap flagged.

Sources #

Curator note
Source for RD-F-102retrieved 2026-04-28
Docs
https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/hypercore/bridgeretrieved 2026-04-28

Methodology #

Detect an admin-role or upgrade transaction appearing in the mempool before confirmation.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol hyperliquid factor RD-F-102 score gray collected_at 2026-04-28 13:58:49