Auditor re-engaged after last exploit

Jito's assessment for RD-F-083 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No prior exploits; no post-exploit re-audit obligation has arisen. Gray = N/A. Jito does proactively engage auditors (OtterSec per-release reviews; Certora FV; Neodyme; Halborn; Offside) but this is pre-emptive, not post-exploit.

Sources #

Docs
Jito MEV audits (Neodyme, Halborn, OtterSec)Profile §8 audit table — 12 distinct engagements across 5 firmsretrieved 2026-04-29

Methodology #

Determine whether a reputable auditor performed a re-audit or incident review after the most recent exploit.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jito factor RD-F-083 score gray collected_at 2026-04-29 15:50:23