defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

delegatecall/call in proposal execution without allowlist

Jupiter Perpetual Exchange's assessment for RD-F-039 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Not applicable to Solana substrate. Solana Realms governance does not use EVM-style delegatecall in proposal execution. BPFLoaderUpgradeable upgrades use specific BPF upgrade instructions, not arbitrary call forwarding with user-supplied targets. Structural architectural difference, not a configuration choice.

Sources #

  • Internal
    Phase-2 briefing + SOLANA_GOVERNANCE.mdBriefing §6 type template: F039 not_applicable for Solana substrate (no EVM delegatecall pattern). SOLANA_GOVERNANCE.md confirms BPFLoaderUpgradeable as upgrade mechanism.retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the governance executor contract uses `delegatecall` or `call` with proposal-supplied target, without enforcing an allowlist of permitted targets.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter-perps factor RD-F-039 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 01:53:11