Fork retains upstream audit coverage
Jupiter Perpetual Exchange's assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Not a fork; the protocol has its own direct audits (OtterSec, Sec3, Offside Labs). Factor measures whether fork retains upstream coverage — not applicable for an original codebase with direct audits.
Sources #
- Internal00-profile.md §5 and §8Profile §5: original codebase; profile §8 lists direct audits by OtterSec, Sec3, Offside Labsretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter-perps factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 01:53:11