defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Known-exploit-template selector deployed by any address

Jupiter Perpetual Exchange's assessment for RD-F-162 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Known-exploit-template selector-pattern deployed by any address. The EVM 4-byte function selector exploit-template database does not exist for Solana BPF programs. Solana BPF programs use Anchor instruction discriminators (8-byte hash), not EVM 4-byte selectors. No equivalent 'known-exploit-template for Solana perps' public database exists comparable to EVM selector-replay tooling. Signal is architecturally specific to EVM substrate.

Sources #

  • Internal
    Phase-2 shared briefing U10Solana BPF Anchor discriminators vs EVM 4-byte selectors — no Solana equivalent DB exists. Briefing §15 U10.retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether any contract has been deployed containing a function-selector pattern matching a known exploit template targeting protocols of this class.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter-perps factor RD-F-162 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 01:53:11