Contributor paid to DPRK-cluster wallet

Jupiter's assessment for RD-F-122 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No public on-chain payment streams to Jupiter contributors are identified. Team compensation is via off-chain payroll or the team cold multisig (JUP token vesting). The 4-of-7 team multisig address is not publicly disclosed, preventing 3-hop analysis for contributor wallet → DPRK cluster paths. Cannot be meaningfully assessed at OSINT tier for off-chain payroll companies per process-learnings guidance.

Sources #

Curator note
process-learnings.md — dev-identity-analyst FAILED sectionProcess-learnings.md: F122 structural gap for off-chain payroll companiesretrieved 2026-04-29
Docs
Jupiter protocol profile — governance topology00-profile.md §6 — multisig address gap notedretrieved 2026-04-29

Methodology #

Determine whether protocol payments to any contributor wallet have an on-chain path ≤3 hops to a known DPRK-labeled cluster.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol jupiter factor RD-F-122 score gray collected_at 2026-04-29 11:51:25