★ Low-threshold multisig vs TVL
Liquity V1 + V2 (LUSD / BOLD)'s assessment for RD-F-028 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No multisig controls core protocol contracts. The only Safe (0xf06016) is a bounty-fund safe with no protocol-admin authority. No M/N threshold to evaluate against TVL peer cohort.
Sources #
- GitHubLiquity v2 Mainnet Addressesbold/contracts/addresses/1.json — Bounties Safe listed with role bounty-fund management, not protocol adminretrieved 2026-05-16
- Liquity Bounties Safe — EtherscanBounties Safe 0xf06016d822943c42e3cb7fc3a6a3b1889c1045f8 — confirmed Gnosis Safe 1.1.1 with bounty assets (~$475K), no protocol-admin roleretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the multisig threshold is abnormally low relative to TVL peer cohort (e.g., 2-of-3 for a protocol with >$100M TVL where peer norm is 5-of-8).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol liquity factor RD-F-028 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 10:35:50