Protocol social channel has scam-coordinator flag

Liquity V1 + V2 (LUSD / BOLD)'s assessment for RD-F-165 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Telegram/Discord channel member flagged as scam-coordinator. Applicable: yes in principle. Current posture: no Discord found for Liquity as of 2026-05-16 (profile section 9: 'Discord: Not found as of 2026-05-16'); no Telegram channel identified. Primary social surface is voting.liquity.org Discourse-based governance forum and X (Twitter). Cannot assess scam-coordinator presence on channels that are not publicly identifiable.

Sources #

Docs
Liquity governance forumProfile section 9 Official Channels: Discord not found as of 2026-05-16; forum is voting.liquity.org (governance proposals)retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether a protocol-adjacent social channel admin is flagged on the curator scam-coordinator watchlist.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol liquity factor RD-F-165 score gray collected_at 2026-05-16 10:35:50