Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Liquity V1 + V2 (LUSD / BOLD)'s assessment for RD-F-172 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No AI co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot co-authored-by trailers) detected in liquity/bold commit history. Deployment commit e367755 and surrounding commits show conventional human-authored commits from contributors bingen, cyril-dfi, bpierre. No public reporting of AI-tool co-authorship in security-critical files.
Sources #
- CommitLiquity bold mainnet deployment commitDeployment commit e367755 — standard human-authored, no AI trailersretrieved 2026-05-16
- Liquity bold GitHub commit historyliquity/bold commits — conventional human-authored, no AI co-authorship trailersretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol liquity factor RD-F-172 score green collected_at 2026-05-16 10:35:50