Deployer address prior on-chain history
Lista DAO's assessment for RD-F-114 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Operative-version (Lista era, U9) deployer 0xd7e38800201d6a42c408bf79d8723740c4e7f631: BSCScan shows this address created the Lending TimeLock in April 2025. Funded ~January 2025 from 0x89e68b97...867f358Ae (no entity label, no mixer label). Activity appears limited to Lista DAO protocol operations. No prior rug-linked contract deployments identified. No Chainalysis or Nansen entity label. Category: normal-dev-history (limited but clean). Note: the Helio 2022-era deployer is a different address and was not assessed per U9 (operative-version assessment applies).
Sources #
- Internal00-profile.md §11 — dev-identity-analyst flagsProfile §11 flags deployer address 0xd7e38800... as Lending TimeLock creator with 3 role-grant transactions on April 8, 2025retrieved 2026-05-12
- BSCScan: 0xd7e38800201d6a42c408bf79d8723740c4e7f631BSCScan address page for deployer 0xd7e38800201d6a42c408bf79d8723740c4e7f631 — funded ~1yr 117 days ago from non-labeled source; no warning tagsretrieved 2026-05-12
Methodology #
Classify the deployer address history as: none (fresh address) / normal-dev-history (prior protocol deploys, non-flagged activity) / linked-to-prior-rug (deployer used in prior known rug).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →