defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Is-a-fork-of

Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-126 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Lombard Finance is an original implementation — not a fork of any upstream protocol. GitHub repository (lombard-finance/evm-smart-contracts) carries no upstream fork relationship. Profile §5 explicitly states: 'Not forked / original implementation.' Protocol architecture (Cosmos SDK appchain Lombard Ledger, CubeSigner HSM key management, Bascule Drawbridge, Consortium multi-signature notary) is unique with no known upstream equivalent. The repository has 37 forks made by others but is not itself a fork. OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 is used as a library dependency, not as an upstream fork.

Sources #

  • GitHub
    lombard-finance/evm-smart-contracts GitHubevm-smart-contracts repository: no 'forked from' labelretrieved 2026-05-05
  • Docs
    Protocol Profile 00-profile.md §5 Fork lineageProfile §5: Not forked / original implementationretrieved 2026-05-05

Methodology #

Identify the upstream protocol this is a fork of (if any) via bytecode similarity, function-selector set overlap, or team declaration.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol lombard factor RD-F-126 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-05 12:03:08