Storage-layout collision risk across upgrades
Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-142 — scored yellow on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
7 total LBTC implementation upgrades since 2024. OZ V2 audit (Nov-Dec 2024) and OZ multipauser audit (Apr 2026) included LBTC in scope, suggesting OZ would have flagged storage-layout issues. No public storage collision report. However, full OZ upgrades-plugin validation across all 7 upgrade pairs was not confirmed from public sources.
Sources #
- Etherscanhttps://etherscan.io/address/0x8236a87084f8b84306f72007f36f2618a5634494#eventsretrieved 2026-05-05
- https://www.openzeppelin.com/news/lombard-auditretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether the OZ upgrades-plugin or manual review flags a storage-layout collision risk between implementation versions.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol lombard factor RD-F-142 score yellow collected_at 2026-05-05 12:03:08