Real-capital social-engineering persona
Lombard Finance's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No curator flag or OSINT evidence of any 'contributor' or 'external integrator' persona with >=1M USD attributed deposits to Lombard or peer protocols used to build social-engineering credibility. The April 2026 DPRK class attack (UNC4736/TraderTraitor) targeted Drift Protocol specifically via a 6-month conference/in-person build-up — Lombard is not mentioned in any DPRK attack report. Third-party LBTC/BARD phishing drainers (pcrisk.com) are user-targeting scams, not insider-implantation patterns. P1 M-only factor. Gray per scoring discipline: no positive curator attestation exists; no adverse signal found. Comparator: Drift Protocol (Kamino cited as clean comparator in hacksdatabase). Lean green.
Sources #
- URL
- 00-data-cache.json — rekt.incidents: []; no Drift-class social engineering event documented for Lombardretrieved 2026-05-05
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →