Partial-drain test transactions
Meteora's assessment for RD-F-091 — scored green on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Cat 6A precursor signal (T-09 phase-2 signal). No partial-drain test transactions observed against Meteora programs. No smart-contract exploit in Meteora history establishes a drain-pattern precedent. The LIBRA liquidity extraction (Feb 2025) was alleged insiders removing LP positions via permissionless DBC/Alpha Vault mechanics, not an admin-level partial drain against Meteora's own program TVL. TVL decline since Jan 2025 peak ($1.69B) to current ($319.87M) is gradual market-driven outflow, not a test-drain spike pattern. Admin-level drain on DLMM would require Squads v3 multisig threshold approval with no on-chain time_lock enforcement.
Sources #
- URLMeteora TVL, Fees, Revenue and VolumeDefiLlama Meteora TVL: $319.87M as of 2026-05-16; 30d change -21.63%; 1d change -0.99% (gradual drift, no single-session drain pattern)retrieved 2026-05-16
- Meteora 00-profile.meta.jsonProfile meta.json: has_active_incident: false; no contract-level exploit identified; DLMM upgrade authority controlled by Squads v3 multisig CoEsykatDegLB7pcMJia79JSriDdi71nPnjgeSfw623k (no on-chain time_lock)retrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Detect one or more small-value outflows prior to a larger drain that match a known pre-strike pattern (low-value same-function calls from new wallet).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →