defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Known-exploit function-selector replay

Meteora's assessment for RD-F-095 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Solana Anchor programs use 8-byte discriminators, not EVM 4-byte function selectors. The signal spec (call-pattern matching against known-exploit EVM function-selector replay templates) is EVM-architecture-specific. No equivalent Anchor-discriminator replay template database exists in the T-09 signal spec. U10 Solana-substrate not_applicable.

Sources #

  • Internal
    Raydium 06-realtime-intel.md precedent (RD-F-095)Raydium 06-realtime-intel.md: RD-F-095 scored green (historical exploit parameter removed at contract level) but noted Solana uses 8-byte Anchor discriminators not EVM 4-byte selectors. Meteora has no equivalent known-exploit replay vector; scored not_applicable given substrate incompatibility with signal spec.retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect whether a call-pattern matches a known-exploit replay template (specific selector sequence and calldata shape) against this protocol.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol meteora factor RD-F-095 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 10:03:05