Contributor paid to DPRK-cluster wallet
Meteora's assessment for RD-F-122 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No public reporting or on-chain analysis has surfaced a Meteora contributor payment-wallet path to a DPRK-labeled cluster. The Hurlock v. Kelsier amended complaint contains no DPRK allegations. OFAC SDN list contains no Meteora-associated name. Chainalysis public DPRK blog makes no mention of Meteora contributor payments. Full contributor payment-wallet hop analysis requires Chainalysis/Arkham enterprise access not available in this pass. Gap: pipeline_unimplemented for non-EVM contributor payment tracing.
Sources #
- URLOFAC Targets DPRK IT Workers Using Crypto | ChainalysisChainalysis DPRK blog — public Lazarus/DPRK attribution page; no Meteora mentionretrieved 2026-05-16
- M3M3 and LIBRA Token Lawsuit: Hurlock v. Kelsier | Burwick LawHurlock v. Kelsier Burwick Law case page — amended complaint contains no DPRK payment-routing allegationsretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether protocol payments to any contributor wallet have an on-chain path ≤3 hops to a known DPRK-labeled cluster.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →