Real-capital social-engineering persona
Meteora's assessment for RD-F-184 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No public reporting or on-chain analysis has identified a Meteora team contributor or external integrator persona who built credibility via 1M+ USD deposits to the protocol for the purpose of later social-engineering or insider access. The LIBRA/M3M3 scheme involved Kelsier Ventures seeding liquidity pools as an external token-launch client, not as an infiltrating contributor building insider protocol access. F184 is M-only OSINT requiring curator-level confidence. Gray per F184 taxonomy note (Drift comparator: no analogous multi-month in-person social-engineering build-up pattern identified for Meteora). Curator input required to confirm or deny.
Sources #
- URLM3M3 and LIBRA Token Lawsuit: Hurlock v. Kelsier | Burwick LawBurwick Law case page — Kelsier described as external token-launch client, not as an insider contributor building deposit-based credibilityretrieved 2026-05-16
- F184 taxonomy batch-24 definition — curator noteF184 taxonomy: M-only OSINT factor; P1 priority; gray is the default Drift comparator where no analogous social-engineering persona pattern is identifiable from public sources. Curator should review if new OSINT surfaces a candidate persona.retrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether a curator-flagged "team contributor" or "external integrator" persona has ≥$1M of attributed real-capital deposits to the target protocol or peer protocols, potentially used to build credibility ahead of a social-engineering attack.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →