Fork retains upstream audit coverage

mETH Protocol's assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Not applicable — protocol is not a fork; upstream audit retention is moot for an original codebase.

Sources #

GitHub
Mantle LSP Contracts — original (no upstream audit retention question)mantle-lsp/contracts: original codebase — fork audit retention not applicableretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol meth-protocol factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:17:50