Bytecode similarity to audited upstream with behavior deviation

mETH Protocol's assessment for RD-F-171 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Protocol is original (not a fork). There is no audited upstream to compare against for AI-copy/behavioral-deviation risk. Factor requires an audited upstream reference — not applicable for original protocols.

Sources #

GitHub
Mantle LSP Contracts — original (bytecode upstream comparison not applicable)mantle-lsp/contracts: original codebase — no upstream bytecode comparison possibleretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Determine whether the bytecode has high structural similarity to an audited upstream but deviates in state-mutation ordering (AI-generated copy risk pattern).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol meth-protocol factor RD-F-171 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:17:50