Mixer withdrawal → protocol interaction

Midas's assessment for RD-F-090 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Mixer-withdrawal-to-protocol-interaction signal. EVM protocol; mixer-funded wallets could in principle acquire mTokens. Midas requires KYC greenlist approval (MidasAccessControl.greenlistedUsers) before any DepositVault interaction, structurally blocking anonymous mixer-funded deposits. No CTI feed configured. No public evidence of mixer-funded wallet interactions with Midas contracts. Deployer funded via MoonPay fiat on-ramp (clean). Production pipeline not implemented; monitoring infrastructure for this signal class (CTI feed + interaction indexer) is not deployed for this protocol.

Sources #

GitHub
Sherlock 2024-05 Midas audit — access control scopesherlock-audit/2024-05-midas — MidasAccessControl.sol: greenlistedUsers mapping gate on DepositVaultretrieved 2026-05-16
Curator note
T-09 phase-2 gap: RD-F-090 not wired for midasCTI feed not configured for midas slug; T-09 §3.2 lists this as phase-2 with gating work required: wallet-clustering feed + attribution SLAretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect whether a wallet that recently withdrew from Tornado Cash, Railgun, or similar mixer has interacted with this protocol.

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol midas factor RD-F-090 score gray collected_at 2026-05-16 09:34:55