Fork retains upstream audit coverage
Midas's assessment for RD-F-131 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Fork audit coverage retention is architecturally not applicable — Midas has independent fresh audits (Hacken + Sherlock), not upstream audit inheritance. The factor's premise (fork relying on upstream audit) does not apply.
Sources #
- AuditHacken Midas AuditHacken + Sherlock independent audits — not inherited upstream coverageretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether the fork's deployed code is covered by either: (a) the upstream audit plus a delta-audit for fork-specific changes, or (b) a fresh independent audit of the fork.
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol midas factor RD-F-131 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 09:34:55