Repo shows AI-tool co-authorship in critical files
Midas's assessment for RD-F-172 — scored gray on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
Main repo is private (RedDuck-Software/midas-contracts, github_private:true per data cache). GitHub commit co-authorship metadata for security-critical files is inaccessible. No public disclosure of AI-tool co-authorship found in Sherlock audit READMEs or Hacken audit documentation. Data unavailable — cannot assess.
Sources #
- Curator noteProfile §4 Private RepoProfile §4 — github_private:true; U6 safe_api_gap; Sherlock audit repos do not expose full commit metadataretrieved 2026-05-16
- Sherlock 2024-08 READMESherlock 2024-08 repo — no AI tool co-authorship disclosure in READMEretrieved 2026-05-16
Methodology #
Determine whether critical security files show commits with AI-tool co-authorship metadata (GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT Code Interpreter).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →
rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol midas factor RD-F-172 score gray collected_at 2026-05-16 09:34:55