defirisk.co
rubric v1.7.0

Cross-chain bridge unverified mint pattern

OpenEden's assessment for RD-F-106 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Cross-chain bridge tx pattern (deposit-src, mint-dst without proof). Not applicable: USDO uses Chainlink CCIP CCT (burn-and-mint with Chainlink attestation, not Merkle-proof); XRPL TBILL is native XRPL issuance, not bridged. Signal targets ecrecover/Merkle-root bridge deposit-without-proof patterns — not present in this protocol's cross-chain architecture. Same not_applicable ruling as for RD-F-103.

Sources #

  • URL
    OpenEden Chainlink CCIP integrationUSDO cross-chain uses Chainlink CCIP CCT — Chainlink-attested burn-and-mint, not ecrecover/Merkle-root bridge patternretrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect cross-chain activity consistent with an unverified mint on the destination chain (deposit on source without corresponding verified proof on dest).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol openeden factor RD-F-106 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 10:11:45