Oracle price deviation >X% from secondary

Orca's assessment for RD-F-099 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

Oracle price deviation vs secondary source. Doubly inapplicable: (1) per U10, Solana oracle comparison infrastructure (Chainlink vs Pyth vs DEX TWAP cross-chain) is EVM-native; (2) structurally, Orca's swap path contains no external oracle at all — Whirlpools is a reserve-based CLMM where pricing derives from pool reserves (sqrt_price, tick state). F053 is green; F180 is N/A for Orca. No oracle hook exists.

Sources #

Docs
Orca developer docs — Whirlpools reserve-based CLMM, no external oraclehttps://dev.orca.so/retrieved 2026-05-16
Internal
Orca profile §7 — no oracle in swap path00-profile.md §7: 'No external oracle in swap path. Whirlpools is a reserve-based CLMM'; 00-data-cache.json sources.oracle_feeds=[]retrieved 2026-05-16

Methodology #

Detect whether the primary oracle's reported price deviates >X% from the best available secondary source (another feed or venue).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol orca factor RD-F-099 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-05-16 02:39:16