Oracle-manipulation-proof borrow cap

Polymarket's assessment for RD-F-073 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.

Evidence summary #

No borrowing exists; no borrow caps. UMA oracle feeds are truth-attestation oracles for event resolution, not real-time price feeds driving liquidations. Oracle manipulation risk in this context is resolution-dispute risk (captured under Cat 3, oracle dependency), not borrow-cap manipulation risk. N/A per taxonomy §Cat 4 PD-024 (lending-only). Data cache: borrow.present=false.

Sources #

Docs
Polymarket docs — Resolution via UMAUMA OO is used for truth-attestation (event resolution), not price feeds for liquidation calculations.retrieved 2026-04-29
Internal
Polymarket data cache — borrow sectionTaxonomy §Cat 4 PD-024: oracle-proof borrow cap is lending-only. Data cache borrow.present=false.retrieved 2026-04-29

Methodology #

Determine whether the per-asset borrow cap is ≤ (oracle pool depth × manipulation-resistance multiplier).

See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →

rubric_version v1.7.0 protocol polymarket factor RD-F-073 score not_applicable collected_at 2026-04-29 16:25:39