First-depositor / share-inflation guard
Polymarket's assessment for RD-F-075 — scored not_applicable on the v1.7.0 rubric. The evidence below is the curator's reasoning for this score.
Evidence summary #
No first-depositor attack vector exists in the Gnosis CTF architecture. Outcome tokens are minted deterministically via splitPosition: each token = 1 pUSD claim on a specific outcome. No share-pool ratio exists to inflate. Token value at resolution is always $0 or $1, determined by UMA oracle, independent of the ratio of deposited assets to outstanding shares. Donation attack (inflating shares by direct token transfer) cannot affect CTF outcome token accounting. N/A per taxonomy §Cat 4 PD-024 (lending-only).
Sources #
- DocsPolymarket docs — CTF overviewCTF architecture: 1 YES + 1 NO = 1 pUSD. Resolution via UMA determines $0/$1 payoff, independent of share accounting.retrieved 2026-04-29
- Gnosis conditional-tokens-contracts (CTF)Gnosis CTF splitPosition: deterministic 1:1 USDC-to-ERC1155 token minting, no pool-ratio mechanics.retrieved 2026-04-29
Methodology #
Determine whether the vault has a first-depositor guard (seed deposit on deploy, virtual-share offset, or floor-check).
See the full factor methodology and distribution across all protocols →